shopping cart
nothing in cart
 
browse by subject
new releases
best sellers
sale books
browse by author
browse by publisher
home
about us
upcoming events
Sep 4th - The Deepest Kindness: ACT and the Therapeutic Relationship [Ottawa River Psychology Group]
Sep 14th - Integrating EMDR into Your Clinical Practice: Five-Day Intensive in Toronto [Leading Edge Seminars]
Sep 23rd - Supporting the Mental Health Needs of Racialized Young People [SickKids CCMH Learning Institute]
Sep 24th - OAMHP 2020 Conference - Diversity in Action: Mental Health for the Underserved [OAMHP - Ontario Association of Mental Health Professionals]
Sep 24th - Emotionally Focused Family Therapy: Restoring Connections and Promoting Resilience, Level 1 [ICEEFT and EFT Toronto Training]
schools agencies and other institutional orders (click here)
Free shipping across Canada for all orders over $50. Please read our Covid-19 statement here.
Join our mailing list! Click here to sign up.
Responsibility and Psychopathy: Interfacing Law, Psychiatry and Philosophy
Malatesti, Luca and John McMillan (Eds)
Oxford U Press POD firm sale / Softcover / 2010-09-01 / 0199551634
Psychiatry / Philosophy
price: $78.95 (may be subject to change)
250 pages
Not in Stock, usually ships in 3-4 weeks

Psychopaths have emotional impairments that can be expressed in persistent criminal behavior. UK and US law has traditionally excused disordered individuals for their crimes citing these emotional impairments as a cause for their criminal behaviour. The discussion of whether psychopaths are morally responsible for their behaviour has long taken place in the realm of philosophy. However, in recent years, this has moved into scientific and psychiatric investigation, fundamentally so with the development of Robert Hare's diagnostic tool, the Psychopathy Checklist.

Responsibility and Psychopathy explores the moral responsibility of psychopaths. It engages with problems at the interface of law, psychiatry, and philosophy, and is divided into three parts providing relevant interdisciplinary background information to address this main problem.

The first part discusses the public policy and legal responses to psychopathy. It offers an introduction to the central practical issue of how public policy should respond to psychopathy, giving insights for those arguing about the responsibility of psychopaths.

The second part introduces recent scientific advancements in the classification, description, and explanation of psychopathy. In particular, Robert Hare illustrates and defends his Psychopathy Checklist (PCL). Surveys of the most recent brain imaging studies on psychopaths and the prospects for treatment are also included.

The third part of the volume includes chapters covering the most significant dimensions of philosophical debate on the moral and criminal responsibility of psychopaths. In relation to this issue, philosophers have considered whether psychopathic offenders possess moral understanding and/or are capable of controlling their criminal behaviour. This part illustrates how answering these questions involves investigating highly debated and central philosophical problems. These difficulties concern the nature of moral understanding, the significance of emotive and cognitive faculties in moral understanding and motivation, and the most appropriate account of moral and criminal responsibility that can justify a response to the psychopathic offenders.

Exploring one of the most contentious topics of our time, this book is fascinating reading for psychiatrists, philosophers, criminologists, and lawyers.
Psychopaths have emotional impairments that can be expressed in persistent criminal behaviour. UK and US law has traditionally excused disordered individuals for their crimes citing these emotional impairments as a cause for their criminal behaviour. The discussion of whether psychopaths are morally responsible for their behaviour has long taken place in the realm of philosophy. However, in recent years, this has moved into scientific and psychiatric investigation, fundamentally so with the development of Robert Hare's diagnostic tool, the Psychopathy Checklist.

Responsibility and Psychopathy explores the moral responsibility of psychopaths. It engages with problems at the interface of law, psychiatry, and philosophy, and is divided into three parts providing relevant interdisciplinary background information to address this main problem.

The first part discusses the public policy and legal responses to psychopathy. It offers an introduction to the central practical issue of how public policy should respond to psychopathy, giving insights for those arguing about the responsibility of psychopaths.

The second part introduces recent scientific advancements in the classification, description, and explanation of psychopathy. In particular, Robert Hare illustrates and defends his Psychopathy Checklist (PCL). Surveys of the most recent brain imaging studies on psychopaths and the prospects for treatment are also included.

The third part of the volume includes chapters covering the most significant dimensions of philosophical debate on the moral and criminal responsibility of psychopaths. In relation to this issue, philosophers have considered whether psychopathic offenders possess moral understanding and/or are capable of controlling their criminal behaviour. This part illustrates how answering these questions involves investigating highly debated and central philosophical problems. These difficulties concern the nature of moral understanding, the significance of emotive and cognitive faculties in moral understanding and motivation, and the most appropriate account of moral and criminal responsibility that can justify a response to the psychopathic offenders.

Exploring one of the most contentious topics of our time, this book is fascinating reading for psychiatrists, philosophers, criminologists, and lawyers.

Contents:

1. Introduction: interfacing law, philosophy and psychiatry, John McMillan and Luca Malatesti
Psychopathy and the Law
2. Psychopathy and criminal responsibility in historical perspective, Tony Ward
3. Stabbing in the dark: English law relating to psychopathy, Peter Bartlett
4. Psychopathy and the law: the United States experience, Stephen J. Morse
5. Policies, law and psychopathy: a critical stance from political philosophy, Matt Matravers
Psychopathy: A New Research Paradigm
6. Defending PCL-R, Luca Malatesti and John McMillan
7. Psychopathy: assessment and forensic implications, Robert D. Hare and Craig S. Neumann
8. Neurodevelopmental bases of psychopathy: a review of brain imaging studies, Carla Harenski, Robert D. Hare, and Kent A. Kiehl
9. The treatment of psychopathy: clinical nihilism or steps in the right direction?, James R. P. Ogloff and Melisa Wood
The Responsibility of the Psychopathic Offender
10. Responsibility and psychopathy, John McMillan and Luca Malatesti
11. Psychopathy and answerability, Antony Duff
12. Psychopathy, responsibility and the moral/conventional distinction, Neil Levy
13. Rationalism, emotivism, and the psychopath, Heidi L. Maibom
14. Reasons, emotion, and moral judgment in the psychopath, Jeanette Kennett
15. The inauthentic evaluative schemes of psychopaths and culpability, Ishtiyaque Haji
16. Intentional action, moral responsibility and psychopaths, Grant Gillett
17. Will a stroke of neuroscience ever eradicate evil?, Ronald de Sousa and Douglas Heinrichs
18. Conclusions: psychopathy and responsibility, a rejoinder, Luca Malatesti and John McMillan

About the Editors:

Luca Malatesti received his doctorate in philosophy of science from the University of Genoa and his doctorate in philosophy from the University of Stirling. He was Wellcome Postdoctoral Research Fellow in the Institute of Applied Ethics at the University of Hull. He is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of Rijeka (Croatia). His areas of research are philosophy of mind and philosophy of psychiatry.

John McMillan is Associate Professor at the School of Medicine, Flinders University. Prior to this appointment he worked at the Hull York Medical School (2004-9), Cambridge (2002-4), Oxford (1998-2002) and Otago (1995-8) where he taught ethics to philosophy and medical students. He is an editor of The Principles of Healthcare Ethics (with Ashcroft, Dawson and Draper) 2007, Empirical Ethics in Psychiatry (with Widdershoven, Hope and Van der Scheer) 2008 and The Limits of Consent (with Corrigan, Liddell, Richards and Weijer) 2009. He was a member of the Nuffield Council on Bioethics working party on ethical issues and dementia which reported on October 1st, 2009. He is about to begin work on a book The Methods of Bioethics (with Adrian Walsh).

Caversham Booksellers
98 Harbord St, Toronto, ON M5S 1G6 Canada
(click for map and directions)
All prices in $cdn
Copyright 2020

Phone toll-free (800) 361-6120
Tel (416) 944-0962 | Fax (416) 944-0963
E-mail [email protected]
Hours: 9-6 Mon-Sat / Closed Sunday (EST)

search
Click here to read previous issues.
other lists
Intl Perspectives in Philosophy & Psychiatry serie
Oxford University Press
Philosophy
Psychiatry
University Presses