How can the process of thinking be grasped when our reflections are already the result of what is to be grasped? Wording the act of thinking seems doomed to lag behind the phenomenon that should be grasped. Examining thinking without ignoring its processual nature can be called radical reflection. She does not claim to describe her subject as "given" regardless of the type of approach, but rather faces the experience of thinking and also the nuances of feeling that play an important role in thinking and articulating. It manifests itself in original approaches from philosophy, psychotherapy, anthropology and cognitive sciences and creates innovative styles of thinking that go beyond traditional dualisms. With contributions by Vincent Colapietro, Terrence Deacon, Patrizia Giampieri-Deutsch, Eugene Gendlin, Steven Hayes, Claire Petitmengin, Vera Saller, Donata Schoeller and Susan Stuart.
|